Trial socrates essays

A scapegoat for the loss in war was needed and Socrates was the prime candidate. At one point, Socrates even implies that he is a better person than most because he possesses self-knowledge, whereas many of the high-ranking members of society do not. Socrates believes self-knowledge. Socrates' Trial Essay Words 4 Pages. I will first explain the most important issues of why Socrates was sent to death. Then I will argue the position that Socrates is innocent, and should not be have been found guilty.

To introduce, Socrates was placed on trial and charged with the crime of impiety. Impiety is the lack of reverence for the gods and other sacred things. As well another major claim was that Socrates was corrupting the children of Athens.

Not only did Socrates believe in his philosophical lifestyle but he also lived it; he claimed this as a reason for his innocence.

Socrates was found to be a stubborn man and therefore this had an extensive impact on the trail. His position had an immense impact on the guilty verdict of his trial because he behaved arrogantly toward the judges who would choose his verdict and punishment.

Plus, his impious acts because he does not believe in the gods that the. What are the two sets of accusations made against Socrates at his trial? How does Socrates respond to each of the charges? Do you think Socrates was guilty or not guilty? In Socrates trial there were two different sets of accusations made against him, one being the newer ones and one being the older ones.

The older charges brought up against him include that he speculates about the things in heaven and the things beneath the earth, which to simplify basically.

Was this trial just? Most people would say no, it is immoral and unjust to execute someone for theft, especially for something as small as an apple. Although this is true, this man broke the law, committing a capital crime.

The result of a capital crime is execution. Therefore, the laws were upheld and this was a just trial. If laws are not followed, what would be the point of laws? Plato, who wrote Apology, was a student of Socrates and this is his account of the trial. Even though he was present at the trial, the colloquy may have been adjusted by Plato to reflect what he thought Socrates should have said or what he thought Socrates meant to say.

Plato was very fond of Socrates, therefore the way he may present him can be bias. Socrates attempted to persuade the men of Athens of. Socrates, an Athenian philosopher of Ancient Greece, a man of great wisdom and knowledge, was put to death at trial, by the accusation of impiety, and corrupting the youths of society.

Socrates had a few accusations up against him and they weren 't that simple to defend against, but that did not stop him, he came prepared and knew what he was in for, that gave him the upper.

Philosopher was accused in corrupting the youth, not believing in the recognized gods and introducing new divinities and in the rejection of civic life in democratic society. It is very difficult to answer on this question, may be even impossible. In my opinion, there are three types of people: 1.

People who believe that Socrates was guilty and deserves the. Exact matches only. Search in title. Search in content. Search in excerpt. Search in posts. Search in pages. Samples Philosophers Socrates Essay. Socrates Essay Socrates is one of the most important and famous figures in western philosophy.

Related Samples. Thomas Aquinas and the Free Will Pages: 4 page s. Plato Philosophy Changed History Pages: 4 page s. Descartes Meditation Pages: 3 page s. This is why Socrates struggles with anyone giving him a definition of piety, because I think that to Socrates piety means acting altruistic.

Since the human condition is that of self serving your own interests, he sees through peoples definitions because he knows that they are going to give a definition that fits their ideas.

Some one will say: Are you not ashamed, Socrates, of a course of life which is likely to bring you to an untimely end? To him I may fairly answer: There you are mistaken: a man who is good for anything ought not calculate the chance of living or dying; he ought only to consider whether in doing anything he is doing right or wrong—acting the part of a good man or of a bad. He is saying that you should not do something good with the anticipation of your gain, but do it because that is what is right and that will be the reward.

Again, Socrates uses his words to show the court that he will not allow himself to apologize for something that he feels he did not do wrong. He would be lying to himself if he did that, and it also could be argued that this action would be impious to oneself. After being found guilty, Socrates speaks to the court about how he should be sentenced.

After the jury comes back with a sentence of death, Socrates is again allowed to address the court. He will be put to death, but his opponents will live as lesser men because of their deeds and that their fate is worse. He says no one knows what lies after death, but he envisions two possibilities.

If death is annihilation, it will resemble an endless, dreamless sleep, which is not at all bad. On the other hand, if what the mystery religions teach is correct, he will move on to an after-life in which he may mingle with the famous dead of former ages. He humorously suggests that he will continue engaging in debate and in deflating the pompous, something that he says will make him happy.

Socrates jail cell is the setting for the Crito dialogue. Socrates is alone with his elderly life-long friend and neighbor Crito. Crito has come early because he has received advance notice of the imminent arrival of the sacred vessel from Delos.

Crito launches into an urgent appeal to Socrates that he accepts the plans that Crito and other friends have made for Socrates to escape. Here is another example of how Socrates only knows what he does not know, much like that of piety.

While he loves that Crito is his loyal friend and would do anything to save him, he cannot allow himself to make a decision in haste without using reason.